Should You Hire a Marketing Agency or Build an In House Team?

The agency versus in house question is asked constantly and answered badly. Most advice comes from agencies selling agency services or consultants selling hiring advice. Neither is disinterested.

The honest answer is: it depends. It depends on your stage, your budget, what you need to achieve, and what capabilities you can realistically build internally. The question is not which is better in absolute terms but which is better for your specific situation.

Both options work. Both options fail. The difference lies in matching structure to need.

The Real Cost Comparison Most Businesses Get Wrong

When comparing agency fees to employee salaries, most businesses dramatically underestimate the true cost of in house teams. The comparison is not agency fee versus salary. It is agency fee versus fully loaded employee cost.

Hidden costs of in house teams beyond salary

Salary is typically 60 to 70 percent of actual employment cost. Employer national insurance, pension contributions, office space, equipment, software licenses, training, management time, HR administration, and recruitment costs add substantially.

A £50,000 salary becomes £65,000 to £75,000 in fully loaded cost. Then add recruitment fees of 15 to 25 percent of salary for each hire. Add the productivity gap during onboarding. Add the cost of mistakes made while learning. Add the management time required for supervision.

The comparison also ignores the capability gap. A single marketing hire cannot match the combined expertise of an agency team. You are not comparing like with like. You are comparing narrow internal capability with broad external capability.

Hiring is one of the most expensive things a business will ever do
When agency fees actually represent better value

Agency fees include not just time but accumulated expertise, proven processes, tested tools, and cross client learning. The agency has made mistakes on other accounts that inform how they work on yours. This experience premium is difficult to replicate through hiring.

Agencies also provide flexibility that employment cannot match. Scale up during campaign periods. Scale down during quiet periods. Access specialists for specific projects without permanent overhead. This flexibility has real financial value that employment structure cannot provide.

For businesses with variable marketing needs, the agency model often delivers better value despite apparently higher rates. The flexibility premium is worth paying.

The hybrid model that works for growing businesses

The choice is not binary. Many successful businesses combine internal coordination with external execution. An internal marketing manager or director who understands the business context works with external specialists who provide deep capability.

This hybrid model provides strategic continuity through internal leadership while accessing specialist capability without building it internally. The internal role focuses on brand knowledge, stakeholder management, and strategic direction. External partners focus on execution excellence in their specialist areas.

The hybrid model requires clear role definition. Internal resources own strategy and coordination. External resources own execution and optimisation. Overlap creates conflict. Clarity creates collaboration.

Signs You Need External Expertise vs Signs You Need Internal Capacity

External expertise makes sense when you need capability you cannot build quickly, when the capability is specialist rather than general, when demand is variable rather than constant, or when objectivity matters.

Internal capacity makes sense when you need constant availability, when the work is deeply integrated with other business functions, when confidentiality concerns limit external involvement, or when you need to build long term organisational capability.

The question to ask is not 'can an agency do this' but 'what is the best structure for how we need this done'. Sometimes that structure is external. Sometimes internal. Sometimes hybrid.

What Agencies Can Do That Internal Teams Cannot

Agencies see what works and fails across multiple businesses, categories, and situations. This cross pollination creates pattern recognition that no single company can develop internally. When an agency says 'we have seen this before', they mean it literally.

This market intelligence has real value. Knowing that a particular approach failed for three similar businesses prevents expensive repetition. Knowing that a specific tactic worked unusually well provides starting hypotheses. Internal teams learn from their own experience. Agencies learn from everyone's experience.

Specialist depth without full-time overhead

Few businesses need a full time SEO specialist, a full time paid media specialist, a full time CRO specialist, and a full time creative director. But most businesses benefit from all these capabilities at various times.

Agencies provide access to specialist depth without corresponding overhead. You get the SEO expertise when you need SEO work. You get CRO expertise when optimising conversion. You do not pay for specialists during periods when their specialism is not required.

Its easier to move fast and break things when you have external partners who can be honest and direct
Objectivity that internal politics makes impossible

Internal teams exist within organisational hierarchies and politics. They have bosses to please, colleagues to maintain relationships with, and careers to protect. This context affects what they say and recommend.

External partners can say things internal teams cannot. 'This strategy is not working' is easier from an outsider than from someone whose job depends on the strategy's apparent success. 'The CEO's favourite idea is wrong' is nearly impossible internally and merely difficult externally.

This objectivity has genuine value for businesses willing to hear difficult truths. The best agency relationships include honest feedback that improves decisions, not just agreement that protects relationships.

Looking for senior marketing leadership without the permanent hire?

Our Marketing Director Consultancy service is where we embed within your business to build capability.

Building Independence, Not Dependency

The best agency relationships create independence rather than dependency. Partners who help you build capability serve you better than partners who create reliance on their continued involvement.

This is counterintuitive from a business model perspective. An agency that makes itself indispensable has guaranteed revenue. An agency that builds client capability risks working itself out of a job.

But agencies that create dependency build fragile businesses on resentful clients. Agencies that build capability create lasting relationships with clients who value partnership over dependency. The business model is different but more sustainable.

When evaluating agency partners, ask what they will teach you. Ask how your internal capability will improve through the relationship. Ask what you will be able to do yourself after working together that you cannot do now. Partners who resist these questions may be optimising for their revenue rather than your outcomes.

The goal of any marketing partnership should be to achieve business objectives. Sometimes that means ongoing agency involvement. Sometimes it means building internal capability. Sometimes it means a combination that evolves over time. The right partner helps you determine the right structure, even when that structure reduces their involvement.

Need a more tailored conversation with our team?

Get In Touch
Contact Us